Search for: "Scott B. McClelland" Results 1 - 7 of 7
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Webinar on PTAB Trial Practice
13 May 2017, 8:49 pm by Patent Docs
Kevin B. [read post]
Patent Docs - http://www.patentdocs.org/
The Path Forward for Intervening Rights: Presaging the En Banc Decision in Marine Polymer v. Hemcon
14 Feb 2012, 1:18 am by Dennis Crouch
Guest Post by Scott McKeown, Greg Gardella, and Lisa M. [read post]
Patently-O - http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/
La nouvelle loi américaine sur les brevets : de nouvelles possibilités d’agir après la délivrance du brevet (2/3)
4 Oct 2011, 9:00 pm by Laurent Teyssèdre
par Philippe Signore et Scott McKeown, du cabinet Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P 3. [read post]
Le blog du droit europeen des brevets - http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/
What companies should worry about from changes produced by HR 1249
14 Sep 2011, 9:20 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Scott McKeown of Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt and Kevin Laurence of Stoel Rives will provide guidance for counsel to IP owners and inventors on the new America Invents Act's post-grant system, including post-grant review proceedings, special transitional post-grant review of business method patents and supplemental examinations. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
Patent Reexamination & Litigation in the Northern District of Illinois -- Avoiding Malpractice Claims
18 Dec 2009, 2:14 am by R. David Donoghue
Scott A. [read post]
Chicago IP Litigation Blog - http://www.chicagoiplitigation.com/
Weekly Roundup: January 28-February 3, 2022
4 Feb 2022, 5:53 am
Campbell, Scott Ferber, and Todd S. [read post]
The Harvard Law School Corporate Governance Blog - http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov
Oral Argument Preview: Can A Judgment Creditor Of A City Employee Directly Enforce Indemnification Against The City Under R.C. 2744.07(A)(2)? David Ayers v. City of Cleveland
3 Jun 2019, 4:54 am by MBettman
McClelland of the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas granted Ayers’ motion for partial summary judgment and entered a judgment of $13,210,000 against the City, determining that R.C. 2744.07(A)(2) allowed Ayers to bring an indemnification claim directly against the City. [read post]
Legally Speaking Ohio - http://www.legallyspeakingohio.com